A sizable minority of children in rich countries live with just one parent who is likely to be a working female — and the U.S. tops that list.
The U.S. has the developed world's highest proportion of single parents, with one in four children being raised by one parent, according to a study based on the analysis of ending with 2007-year statistics conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Usually, that parent is the mom or other female. In the U.S., as in every other industrialized country, most single-parent households are single-mother households.
I found this study supports my intuitive sense of an amazing shift that has occurred within the past few decades. When I was a kid in the late 50's, divorce was rare, births to unwed mothers even more rare. Back then, generally no single person was ever allowed to adopt, and never-ever same-sex couples, so single-parent homes generally occurred only through divorce or the death of a parent.
My parents were divorced in the 70's. Even then, it was somewhat scandalous. I distinctly remember my Junior High (Middle) School athletic coach calling me into her office. I was a female-jock throughout my youth, so she knew me well. I thought she was going to talk to me about one of our teams, but instead she asked me about my parents' divorce. In those days, their names were printed in the newspaper's "Vital Statistics" section, which listed births, deaths, separations and divorces. I was horrified. I answered her questions with one word when possible. I had the unmistakable feeling that she was more interested in gossip than she was worried about me (my father is well-known in my hometown.)
Now, there is no "Vital Statistics" in newspapers to embarrass the newly separated or divorced, and happily singles and same-sex couples can adopt children.
It is incredible that in our culture, as well as those of most of the other industrialized countries, the study found that the past has flipped completely over within such a short time. I also found it interesting that the study looked at what it was like for a single mom to raise children, but did not delve into the impact of being the child on a single-parent household.
My parents' divorce definitely had a negative impact on me.
Of 27 industrialized countries studied by the OECD, the U.S. had 25.8 percent of children raised by a single parent, compared with an average of 14.9 percent among the other countries in the study.
According to NewsOne, a news agency serving the African American community, the study found that 72 percent of black children in the U.S. are raised in single-parent households.
The only country in the study where single fathers look like more than a faint sliver is Belgium, where there are still nearly twice as many children living with single mothers as with single fathers.
Exactly what it means to be a single parent — for your lifestyle and how you spend your time — varies greatly by country. In some countries, including the United States and Japan, nearly all single parents work; in others, like Malta and Turkey, most single parents do not have jobs.
Ireland, in the U.K., was second with 24.3 percent; followed by New Zealand with 23.7 percent. Greece, Spain, Italy and Luxembourg had among the lowest percentages of children being raised in single-parent homes, according to the study.
Experts pointed to a variety of factors to explain the high U.S. percentage, including a cultural shift toward greater acceptance of single-parent child rearing.
Sadly, the study noted that the U.S. also lacks policies to help support families, including childcare at work and national paid maternity leave, which are commonplace in other countries.
"When our parents married, there was a sense that you were marrying for life," said Edward Zigler, founder and director of Yale's Edward Zigler Centre in Child Development and Social Policy. "That sense is not as prevalent."
Single parents in the U.S. were more likely to be employed — 35.8 percent compared to a 21.3 percent average — but they also had higher rates of poverty, the report found.
“The in-work poverty is higher in the U.S. than other OECD countries, because at the bottom end of the labor market, earnings are very low,” said Willem Adema, a senior economist in the group’s social policy division. “For parents, the risk is higher because they have to make expenditures on childcare costs.”
The Paris-based organization looked at a broad sector of indicators that affected families and children, including childhood poverty, early education and amount of time spent on parental care.
Across the nations examined, preschool enrollment has grown from 30 to 50 percent between 1998 and 2007. The average enrollment was 58.2 percent, while in the U.S. it was lower.
The report noted that public spending on child welfare and education is higher in the U.S. than in other countries — $160,000 per child compared to $149,000. However, the authors say most of that money is spent after the crucial early childhood years.
“This means early investment — including childcare and support for families around the time of birth — could be strengthened,” the authors wrote in a separate paper examining the United States.
The study pointed out that the U.S. is the only OECD country that does not have a national paid parental leave policy. Some states have started to adopt such policies, but most parents are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave. This is particularly difficult for unwed mothers, who may not be able to afford to take time off, Zigler said.
“We have not built in the kind of national support systems for families and children that other countries have,” he said.
Childhood poverty rates in the U.S. are also expected to climb — 23.5 percent from 20 percent. Adema said the rise is a direct result of the financial crisis and higher unemployment rates.
“The financial strain causes all sorts of other strain, so ultimately it might contribute to family dissolution,” Adema said. “At the same time, it might bring some families together. I suspect that the response differs across families.”
The single parent phenomenon has been occurring over recent decades. The study noted that the U.S. and the U.K. have higher teenage birth-rates than other countries, partially contributing to the higher single-parent numbers, though the proportion of children born outside marriage was not significantly higher than the other countries.
Christina Gibson Davis, a professor at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Police, said changing gender roles, the rise of contraception, high incarceration rates in some communities and an acceptance of having children out of wedlock have all contributed to the growing number.
Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, added it isn't being a single parent in itself that raises difficulties, saying, "Single moms do a brilliant and amazing job raising their children. It is also true that single moms in this country are systemically underpaid, and systematically under-resourced and systemically unrespected. It's not the fact they are single moms that makes things difficult."
— E
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
The New American Order
I was born during the Eisenhower Administration.
Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower, in fact. So long ago that few have any notion of who he was. [He was the 34th president of the U.S., the one who served BEFORE John F. Kennedy.]
Ike was also a five-star general. During World War II, he served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe, with responsibility for planning and supervising the successful invasion of France and Germany in 1944–45, from the Western Front. In 1951, he became the first supreme commander of NATO.
Just for some perspective, Ike was sworn in as president in 1953, the same year of the public coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. She had actually become the British sovereign the year before, following the death of her father, King George VI. The public coronation was delayed because it was viewed as unseemly to celebrate her ascension to the crown until after a suitable time of mourning for the late king.
Queen Elizabeth is now the longest serving monarch in the history of the Commonwealth.
Interestingly, the coronation of the Queen was the first ever to be televised (although the then BBC Television Service had covered part of the procession from Westminster Abbey after her father's coronation in 1937), and was also the world's first major international event to be broadcast.
Queen Elizabeth was crowned by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Geoffrey Fisher. The crowd shouted "God save the Queen!" at the exact moment St. Edward's Crown touched the new monarch's head. The princes and peers gathered then put on their own coronets, and a 21-gun salute was fired from the Tower of London.
In a moment impossible to be scripted, at the very moment when the crown was lowered onto her head, the televised event went from glorious black-and-white to color — and the technological world has never been the same since.
Why have I gone through this tedious history lesson? Because it is important for readers to gain an understanding of my own perspective, that I am in fact, older than dirt. Also, I have deliberately launched this blog on the week of another highly anticipated British royal event — the wedding of Prince William to the "commoner" Kate Middleton.
For me, the past, present and future are colliding. The conservative Queen Elizabeth, always in a hat and gloves, turned 85 last week. She handed out money to well-wishers on the street in a long-standing tradition, while the soon-to-be Princess Kate went into an upscale boutique to buy lingerie — while a bevy (or, is it a gaggle?) of cameras openly recorded her selections from outside the shop through its windows. The old order and the new.
Today's world is just short of incomprehensible to me. It is a place where visions of the Apocalypse have seamlessly merged with our everyday lives. Cell phones allow users to video up women's skirts, and to play violent, hate-filled video games while earning carpal tunnel of the thumbs. The coarser the better; intolerance is the new norm; eating disorders have exploded; and politics have truly become a blood sport. Incivility is seen as a badge of honor; and more Americans now believe that the best and most prosperous days are behind the country than at any time since surveys have been conducted.
In my world, each new generation was a bridge to the old. It was a gradual procession of change that left a certain measure of understanding and relate-ability to each group. There was always a generation gap, but if you chose to and made the effort, you could actually see across it. No more. Now that gap is a divide so deep and wide that it almost feels like we live on completely different planets. There are few shared standards, values, faiths, languages, goals, entertainments, or even foods that have been carried on from my generation to this one.
I honestly feel like an alien in my own land. Oddly, I have more in common with my father's and even grandfather's generations than I do with this one. We have lost our national kinship. The customer is no longer always right; women are welcoming being seen as sexual objects; cruelty and even brutality against children and adults is ignored; lies are laughed at and often admired; celebrities are god-like; and materialism has become the only measure
of success. We are quickly becoming a country with no soul.
This almost total disconnect I feel with the present causes a pain so profound that I have no words to express it. This month, two soap operas that have aired for more than 40 years were cancelled. So-called "scripted" entertainment is losing ground fast to "reality" TV, that glorifies obnoxious, disgusting and shallow behavior, and showers fame and conspicuous wealth on
illiterate, high-school drop outs.
It is a momentous challenge for me to find my way now. To find meaning in the madness. Like a blind woman, I grope around the cold technology, and equally cold hearts that crowd around me. This blog is dedicated to my journey — and no, I fear GPS navigation won't be any help.
— E
Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower, in fact. So long ago that few have any notion of who he was. [He was the 34th president of the U.S., the one who served BEFORE John F. Kennedy.]
Ike was also a five-star general. During World War II, he served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe, with responsibility for planning and supervising the successful invasion of France and Germany in 1944–45, from the Western Front. In 1951, he became the first supreme commander of NATO.
Just for some perspective, Ike was sworn in as president in 1953, the same year of the public coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. She had actually become the British sovereign the year before, following the death of her father, King George VI. The public coronation was delayed because it was viewed as unseemly to celebrate her ascension to the crown until after a suitable time of mourning for the late king.
Queen Elizabeth is now the longest serving monarch in the history of the Commonwealth.
Interestingly, the coronation of the Queen was the first ever to be televised (although the then BBC Television Service had covered part of the procession from Westminster Abbey after her father's coronation in 1937), and was also the world's first major international event to be broadcast.
Queen Elizabeth was crowned by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Geoffrey Fisher. The crowd shouted "God save the Queen!" at the exact moment St. Edward's Crown touched the new monarch's head. The princes and peers gathered then put on their own coronets, and a 21-gun salute was fired from the Tower of London.
In a moment impossible to be scripted, at the very moment when the crown was lowered onto her head, the televised event went from glorious black-and-white to color — and the technological world has never been the same since.
Why have I gone through this tedious history lesson? Because it is important for readers to gain an understanding of my own perspective, that I am in fact, older than dirt. Also, I have deliberately launched this blog on the week of another highly anticipated British royal event — the wedding of Prince William to the "commoner" Kate Middleton.
For me, the past, present and future are colliding. The conservative Queen Elizabeth, always in a hat and gloves, turned 85 last week. She handed out money to well-wishers on the street in a long-standing tradition, while the soon-to-be Princess Kate went into an upscale boutique to buy lingerie — while a bevy (or, is it a gaggle?) of cameras openly recorded her selections from outside the shop through its windows. The old order and the new.
Today's world is just short of incomprehensible to me. It is a place where visions of the Apocalypse have seamlessly merged with our everyday lives. Cell phones allow users to video up women's skirts, and to play violent, hate-filled video games while earning carpal tunnel of the thumbs. The coarser the better; intolerance is the new norm; eating disorders have exploded; and politics have truly become a blood sport. Incivility is seen as a badge of honor; and more Americans now believe that the best and most prosperous days are behind the country than at any time since surveys have been conducted.
In my world, each new generation was a bridge to the old. It was a gradual procession of change that left a certain measure of understanding and relate-ability to each group. There was always a generation gap, but if you chose to and made the effort, you could actually see across it. No more. Now that gap is a divide so deep and wide that it almost feels like we live on completely different planets. There are few shared standards, values, faiths, languages, goals, entertainments, or even foods that have been carried on from my generation to this one.
I honestly feel like an alien in my own land. Oddly, I have more in common with my father's and even grandfather's generations than I do with this one. We have lost our national kinship. The customer is no longer always right; women are welcoming being seen as sexual objects; cruelty and even brutality against children and adults is ignored; lies are laughed at and often admired; celebrities are god-like; and materialism has become the only measure
of success. We are quickly becoming a country with no soul.
This almost total disconnect I feel with the present causes a pain so profound that I have no words to express it. This month, two soap operas that have aired for more than 40 years were cancelled. So-called "scripted" entertainment is losing ground fast to "reality" TV, that glorifies obnoxious, disgusting and shallow behavior, and showers fame and conspicuous wealth on
illiterate, high-school drop outs.
It is a momentous challenge for me to find my way now. To find meaning in the madness. Like a blind woman, I grope around the cold technology, and equally cold hearts that crowd around me. This blog is dedicated to my journey — and no, I fear GPS navigation won't be any help.
— E
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)